The
Boyfriend of the Week
October 17, 2000
This week's Boyfriend will probably interest many of you. After all, it's
been a good solid year or two since I last featured an Asian Boyfriend.
Not to mention one who is globally known as a guy who can no-kidding kick
your butt.
But Chow Yun-Fat has recently made the Hong-Kong/Hollywood
transition, so even if you aren't a big fan of "Ying Hsiung Pen Se," you
can still catch a couple of really good flicks at your local
video store. And if you haven't, you ought to. Why? Four words: "Cuz
Chow Yun-Fat Rules!"
As a matter of fact, I "met" Chow Yun-Fat right about the time I met
Jackie Chan, my other Asian-Boyfriend-Who-Rules. There was a year or two
in my life where I hung out with a lot of people who liked to watch Hong
Kong cop movies, and Chow and Jackie were two guys who showed up a lot. I
didn't take a lot of notice of Chow in those days, though, because he was
in the really serious and often pretty violent movies (although one web
site I was reading said he's actually well-known in Hong Kong for doing
comedies)(believe it or not). Jackie was blindingly fun -- I have never
seen a Jackie Chan movie I didn't absolutely love! Even the lamest
Jackie Chan movie makes me hysterical with laughter and glee.
However, I didn't put Chow Yun-Fat up here to talk about Jackie Chan. And,
before I get started, let me clear up a little confusion you may be
feeling: Chow is Yun-Fat's last name. But I'm using it here to refer to
him because think saying "Chow" is a lot more fun than saying "Yun-Fat"
(not to mention it conserves syllables). So, first name is Yun-Fat.
Last name is Chow. Boyfriend name is "My Sweetie, Chow."
If you've never seen a Chow Yun-Fat movie, and you aren't a big fan of
subtitles, you're in luck! Because the director Chow Yun-Fat is most
often associated with in Hong Kong is John Woo. Why does that make you
lucky? Because John Woo has ALSO made the Hong Kong/Hollywood transition.
And in "The Replacement Killers," the two of them teamed up together again
for a good old-fashioned shoot-'em-up (what John Woo is famous for -- lots
of guns and bullet wounds).
"The Replacement Killers," which I just saw last weekend, is about a guy
who is a hit man. But it's against his will. He owes some pretty bad
dudes and is having to repay them by shooting the people they want dead.
If he doesn't do it, they'll kill his family. Chow is this hit man, and
boy, when Chow Yun-Fat comes at you with a gun, you better run. He never
misses, mostly because he shoots about 35,000 bullets at you. The odds of
missing are greatly reduced when you are spitting out bullets faster than
kids can spit out brussels sprouts. Anyway, the last hit Chow is told to
carry out is one he just can't bring himself to do. So, he tries to get a
forged passport so he can flee to China and scoop up his family before the
bad guys notice he's skipped town. Only while he's hooking up with the
forger, played by Mira Sorvino, the bad guys find him there and the
shootin' match begins. The shootin' match pretty much continues on from
there until the end of the movie, actually. Was this a good movie? Eh,
not really (brave the subtitles and rent "Hard Boiled" instead). Was I
entertained? You bet!
Now, if you truly want to experience Chow Yun-Fat, most people will argue
that you've GOT to see him in the shoot 'em ups. It's what he's known
for. It's what he's done the most of. These people think "Chow Yun-Fat"
and it immediately brings the co-phrase "John Woo" with it. I disagree,
however. In fact, if I had it my way, I would erase my memory of all those
old John Woo movies (not that they were bad movies -- they weren't) and
replace them with one single movie memory: that of "Anna and the
King." [Insert silly girlish sigh here.]
When "Anna" came out, I remember being pretty curious about it. For one
thing, it looked like the cinematography was going to be breathtaking.
And
for another, I was curious about the selection of Chow to play the
role I had only seen Yul Brenner in. And I love Yul Brenner, though even
as a child I was confused about why he was the King of Siam even though he
was quite obviously not of Asian heritage. Chow was a big step in the
right direction. At least he looked the part, right? But I had heard
that the new version of the King was not the same as the Yul Brenner one.
He was apparently going to be a little softer around the edges. And a lot
more complex emotionally.
Hence the confusion. Chow Yun-Fat is an old softie? I'll believe it when
I see it!
And that's exactly what I did. I saw it and from minute one, I totally
believed it. Chow was an absolutely wonderful king. He carried with
him just the right amount of regal haughtiness and human tenderness. The
complexity fueled by his affection and respect of Anna was so much more
meaningful and interesting in the new version. Instead of Anna just
traipsing around complaining about how things are done and occasionally
breaking into corny song, Anna was thoughtful. Twisted by the realities
she saw around her. Unsure how best to respond to certain situations.
And, best of all, Anna was Jodie Foster. And she never sang a single
note.
Caution: Spoiler Alert!
A prime example of the complexity I'm talking about was the scene in which
the King is made aware of the fact Tuptin (the woman who was torn from her
peasant lover and given to the King by her family to serve as a concubine)
runs away from the palace to try to rejoin her true love. In Siam, the
punishment for this kind of "traitorous" action is death. But, when Anna
hears Tuptin is about to be executed for this, she is horrified. She
dashes into the King's chambers and demands that he stop this horror from
taking place.
The King's reaction truly brought home the fact that this movie was about
a hundred levels deeper that the old musical. Instead of just yelling
"NO!" and making Anna flatten out on the floor to keep her head below his
(while he struts around saying "Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera"), the
King
is suddenly in anguish. He had been trying to figure out how he could
intervene to stop the execution himself -- an act he was sure he could do
and still appear to be in charge and intolerant of such behavior -- he was
now forced to let it go on as planned. Why? Because now that Anna had
make a fuss, there was no way for him to stop the execution without
appearing to be a weak man. And that he could not do. Not because of
pride, but because he knew that perception could lead to a series of
events that would destroy his country.
This truth torments him -- we see him as Tuptin is being executed praying
like crazy and we can tell from his face that it's killing him to let this
continue. But because of the politics of the time, he is simply unable to
do anything to stop it without risking the stability of his reign.
Okay! Spoiler is over!
Argh! You see what I mean? There was nothing like that in the musical.
And for good reason, too. It really wasn't the musical's goal to portray
the story as realistically as possible (hence Yul Brenner, I imagine). The
musical simply wanted to entertain, with possibly a teeny little
anti-enslavement morality lesson tucked away inside somewhere. But take
away the songs, go back to the truth, and then get Chow Yun-Fat and Jodie
Foster at the helm, and you've got one heck of a movie.
Now, I am already aware that many many many people will not agree with me
on this. "Anna and the King" didn't get terrific reviews (can't remember
why, don't care either). But go ahead! Disagree with me! See if I care!
It's not going to change the fact that "Anna and the King" is what made me
fall in love with Chow Yun-Fat. All the bullets and brussels sprouts in
the world couldn't do what that dance scene did for me!
A little biographical information on Our Sweetie Chow: Chow Yun-Fat was
born in Lamma, a small island off of Hong Kong, on May 18, 1955. When
Chow was 10, he and his family packed up their stuff and moved to Hong
Kong, where Chow spent most of his formative years. Formative is truly
the right word, too, as it was there that he discovered the two things he
says most influenced him: the Cantonese Opera and American movies.
When Chow was 18, he landed his first role as an actor. Was it in a cop
film? Did it involve lots of gunfights and gore? Was John Woo involved?
Answer to all: nope. It was, and you'll never believe this, a SOAP
OPERA. Yep, Chow answered a newspaper ad that announced a search for
young actors. He interviewed and auditioned and was quickly accepted and
enrolled in the tv station's training program. Soon after, he hit the
soaps. In fact, one web site I read said he was in multiple soap operas,
and even has some photos, which were absolutely hilarious (see "God of
Actors" web site link, below).
Chow also made a few movies in those early years, though they had titles
like "Massage Girls," and weren't, uh, huge critical successes. The first
movie he did that got him some recognition was a film called "The Story of
Woo Viet." It came out in 1981 and was quickly followed by a series of
bombs and a few personal problems that kept Chow from hitting stardom. It
wasn't until 1986, when he made his first John Woo movie ("A Better
Tomorrow") that people really started to sit up and take notice of Our
Sweetie Chow. But, as proven from the test of time, the Chow-Woo
combination is a good one. Chow is a believable gangster/cop/etc. and
John
Woo is a good storyteller. Put them together and what have you got?
Bippity-boppity boo.
Chow's next movie is coming from critically acclaimed ex-Boyfriend Ang Lee. It's call "Crouching Tiger,
Hidden Dragon" and is about a magical jade sword that disappears, spurring
a quest for the missing treasure. It's being described as a really
beautifully filmed epic and has gotten great reviews ever since it played
at the Toronto Film Festival.
Never fear, though. After this arty movie, Chow's going right back to
John Woo for "King's Ransom," which is supposedly about two thief brothers
caught in a love triangle. John Woo has also said it's going to be an
homage to "The Thomas Crowne Affair," but I'm assuming he doesn't mean the
Pierce Brosnan version. Anyway, Chow Yun Fat will play one of the
brothers and the object of the brothers' affections will be played by. .
ME!
Okay, okay, I'm just kidding. It never hurts to dream, right? Right.

MacGyver
Factor Score 98.2%. Because when he was bad, he was very very bad,
but when he was good he was King Mongkut.
Chow Yun-Fat:
God of Actors
An
Interview with Chow Yun-Fat
Chow Yun-Fat's IMDB
Page